![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Author | Topic: 'Over-looked' QDK suggestions |
carlii |
![]() OK, I have used QDK for about a year now and what I don't get, after seeing all its newest releases is that the number of conditional choices you have are stilly pretty minimal. Surely their are plenty, plenty more conditionals you could make up with such a versitile programming code like Quest? |
Computer Whizz |
![]() Well, that's basically IT! What more do you need to do other then comparing two numerics or the question one? Sure you could add in loads of options - but they aren't really needed... Computer Whizz |
Tyrant |
![]() I agree with Computer Whizz on this one. Quest is pretty much packed with everything you need, and now it's just up to your imagination. What else did you have in mind for a condition that Quest doesn't have? |
Alex |
![]() Versatility is one thing. Elegance is another. |